Why women why?

[TheNewNeko]

Boy Steve-o's got some real issues. As a friend, I might suggest taking out your aggression Pittsburgh style. Go to a bar, find an unsuspecting woman in a bathroom stall and then spend the next three years convincing hundreds of thousands of fans who think you can't do wrong that technically, you weren't guilty. That is, on the contingency that you're actually heterosexual. Honestly, you're doing it again and it's just not right.

You just keep digging yourself into a deeper hole every time you post.

[King888]

I completely agree with everything Steve(M2s) said.

[espnews26]

A lot of posts in this thread can be summed up by this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0

[racingchick1020]

I completely agree with everything Steve(M2s) said.

All women are not gold diggers and rely on sugar daddies to get them everything they want.

And by the way - you always join the antagonist side of every argument. Why?

[Melyssa56]

It is true that not all women are gold-diggers. I'm not, my mother was not (too bad -- LOL), and a few of my friends are not. This is what the deal is for women at certain ages:

20: "What does he look like?"
25: "Is he well off?"
30: "Where is he?"

[beachbabe8588]

hello..
im new on here..
so if anyone can tell me how to meet friends and how things work that would be great

[flora1941]

Continue posting on the boards, and join us in the chat room M-F between 3 p.m. - 6 p.m. ET. You are welcome and we are a friendly group of people. Just log into chat and jump in and join us.

Welcome to GSN

[beachbabe8588]

thanks..
how do u get on chat?

[flora1941]

thanks..
how do u get on chat?

go to http://www.gsn.com/shows/gsnlive/index/html put this link into your favorites.

[King888]

All women are not gold diggers and rely on sugar daddies to get them everything they want.

And by the way - you always join the antagonist side of every argument. Why?

lol yes they are. My older sister has had over 4 different boyfriends in her life, and the reason none of those relationships worked out well is because she always complained and whined and wanted her bf to pay for everything, which matches the average present-day woman. And why I side with the antagonists is quite simple Mandy, all the protagonists are losers, such as last night when I made my 50 insults directly to CM Punk on Twitter and he was too much of a coward to reply.

[racingchick1020]

lol yes they are. My older sister has had over 4 different boyfriends in her life, and the reason none of those relationships worked out well is because she always complained and whined and wanted her bf to pay for everything, which matches the average present-day woman.

What kind of twisted perception of life do you have? Just because your sister wants her boyfriend to pay for everything for her doesn't mean that another woman's going to do the same thing.

When I get a job, I'm going to do the following: Help pay the rent, save money, and spend wisely. If you think I'm going to force a guy to pay for expensive things for me, then you're crazy. I can see a dinner every once in a while, and both sides of the couple paying the mortgage of their house, but I'm not going to force him to shell out money for some stupid (s-bomb).

I'm sure that there are other women out there who think the same way I do.

all the protagonists are losers, such as last night when I made my 50 insults directly to CM Punk on Twitter and he was too much of a coward to reply.

Your tweets are protected; I can't see them even though you're following me. Famous people aren't just going to reply to any little thing. I've mentioned Johnny Ace in the past using his handle and I haven't gotten a reply back. I don't get retweeted every time I use WWE's handle in my tweets. Certain things are commentable and retweetable (those aren't words, but I don't care). I think you know where I'm going with this.

[TheNewNeko]

lol yes they are.

Why am I smelling a sequel to Brokeback Mountain in the works?

So your older sister is the picture perfect model for roughly 3.5 billion women in this world? Is that honestly what you're trying to project to me? Because if so, I think people will just stand there and laugh at you.

Oh and beachbabe, I added you to my friends list.

[M2nFarisFan]

Well, not all women are gold diggers. When you are 40, and you're single, either you are divorced, widowed, or pretty much stopped looking because you're either not interested any more, or you just plain don't get it. Most of the women that age are what they are. They usually have maturity, and financial stability and a good job. They are looking for that guy who can mow the lawn, and fight for them, and have kids - not procreate like 25 year olds. That's where Melyssa and Neko come from (and don't listen to Neko about love - ask him about the second question of his self-nomenclatured "Apathy Test" and it tells more than any post on here could. He just obsesses about people like me having homosexuality because I actually have success with women. It's an obsession, and from a psychological standpoint, he seems to have expertise to declare it upon others....after all, you probably acquire mastery from experience. ) But the OP is younger - 20 or so IIRC. The game's a little bit different then. You need money and a good body and a good attitude. If you don't have them, you're going to come up short - literally - when you try to get that partner.

When you are 25, you don't have judgmental capabilities....women of this generation "want it NOW" more than anything. Look at them on the trolley....texting their friends. They get their ideas from Jersey Shore and soap operas; it's unfortunate. And I don't get where I called them gold diggers either. Gold digging is buying a $50,000 engagement ring or a $250,000 Mercedes. It is NOT taking her to dinner at her favorite restaurant, or going to Macy's on her birthday to get the shoes in the window she needs to have. It's not giving her a ride in the car that has a good paint job and doesn't look like it came off of Fred Sanford's lot. You don't have to be exquisite, but you darn well better have something in the bank. If you are living off of student loans or welfare in this town, sorry, folks, you aren't getting women. That's not any method of gold digging. It's called security.

And I mean, if you ladies are not like that, it's fine, don't get me wrong, there are ones out there that are frugal. It comes with age and usually from coming from a background with little money or financial straits. But you know, I'm not that way. I don't have a lot of money, but I have enough that I don't have to go into hilljack country and have women desperate for families because "that guy's hot". There's nothing women like more than normal people with good intentions. If you have anything to hide, you're going to get turned off and out like a disco record at Veterans Stadium. I told you about Amy, who simply wanted a Valentine. She was modest, but I didn't ask her for her phone number or info. Why? Mostly because I wasn't ready. There are too many girls and not enough women in this world. I thought about it later, and talked to her again (and I plan on visiting her and having another chat again - I might see if she will go to the Pens game with me....) I'd maintain I have control over my creepiness - in actuality, I felt kind of bad because as a man, I should take the lead on it. But in truth, even if she doesn't date me, so what. Having that chat on Valentine's Day still makes me smile. And it meant more to me than anything.

There are a lot of weird guys who see females as objects of desire rather than people. The problem is, as a guy, you are prewired for it, and it's normal. A lot of the posters have said that it's not what it's all about. Well, if you are 40 and still call names and people "gay" like a 16 year old, chances are it tells why you are alone in this world.

There's a difference between women of wisdom and women of youth, and that is, women of youth want things and a guy they can tell their girlfriends about and be proud of. And they want things, and someone who will give them everything they want. It's true for people who are like myself and the OP, and that's why I said what I said. End of story.

[King888]

Your tweets are protected; I can't see them even though you're following me. Famous people aren't just going to reply to any little thing. I've mentioned Johnny Ace in the past using his handle and I haven't gotten a reply back. I don't get retweeted every time I use WWE's handle in my tweets. Certain things are commentable and retweetable (those aren't words, but I don't care). I think you know where I'm going with this.

No they aren't, I put my tweets back on public last night. And my stuff wasn't little, come on I must have sent him over 50 tweets directly insulting him @CMPunk and he himself admitted he'll try to own anybody that challenges/insults him and it's obvious he was too much of a worthless coward to reply, so therefore I beat him by forfeit.

[King888]

Why am I smelling a sequel to Brokeback Mountain in the works?

So your older sister is the picture perfect model for roughly 3.5 billion women in this world? Is that honestly what you're trying to project to me? Because if so, I think people will just stand there and laugh at you.

Not completely what I'm saying, but IMO it should be the women catering to the needs of the men. Think about it, Adam came before Eve, Jesus himself was a man, and over the years its been proven that the male is the dominant species especially with the fact that the United States has only had male Presidents. So I feel that women shouldn't have any rights to even think that they're better then men, which in the case of most women is true.